Earlier this week we were instructed that we'll be peer reviewing another groups project. The template (shown below) was meant for us to jot down how the other groups project is turning out. We had to make sure that their film followed the basic criteria for the project and also added in constructive comments on how we thought of the film and if there could be any improvements. The initial viewing of the other groups project left us quite confused. Like many other student films, including ours, the filming technicality is there but the plot is not always so vivid. A first impression of the other groups film gave off the idea that a girl with premonitions of a grim future, tries to prevent that from becoming reality. At first we didn't really understand the premise. It seemed a little convoluted. However, after watching the film a couple of times and conversing with the other group we understood it. We suggested that they re-edit their film since the quick edits and seemingly non-sequential, or rather confusing cuts, made the film convoluted. Despite that, they most of the criteria for the film. They used proper lighting, varying camera angles, and executed the title slides properly.
No comments:
Post a Comment